Nemesis: The Last Days of the American Republic by Chalmers Johnson

Review over Nemesis: The Last Days of the American Republic by Chalmers Johnson

Johnson in his new book explains the future of America and threats that will result in destruction of American empire. Johnson makes his case citing ancient Rome to show how imperialism and militarism undermined the Republic. The momentous point is that the United States must do to avoid the appointment with Nemesis. But at first, Johnson discusses how America became an imperial tyranny.
He begins with the fact that one of the most important purposes of founders was preventing from recurrence of the tyranny that they had tolerated under Britain’s kingdom. They tried to prevent tyrannies of all powers. In order to this purpose, the congress was given the parliamentary power; it made final decision to go to war and impeachment the president. After a century this form of distribution of power changed and the president became the fundamental power in the government.
In contrast to Americans’ ideal, from the founding of American republic to Eisenhower’s presidency the main concern of the government was war. Since 1941 United States engaged in many wars, as Vidal said between the end of the World War II and September 11, 2001, United States engaged in 201 oversea war and struggle. United States entered in some of these wars by choice such as World War I, Guam, Cuba and … And other wars which were not war of choice such as World War II, Cold War , Korean War , and… .
In modern age we can refer to “desk murderers” whom instructed remote control killing by bombarding of a country that lacks any forms of air defense or by firing of cruise missiles from a warship at sea into countries unable to respond such as Iraq, Sudan or Afghanistan. In fact there is enormous number of desk murderers in American executive branch or in high ranks of their army. The American soldiers are empowered to excessive use of force. For instance, they are authorized to use lethal force whenever they feel threatened.
United States ruled Afghanistan and Iraq through fear, torture and indefinite detention. American killing of people in Iraq was more crucial than in Afghanistan because Iraq was more populous and on the other hand, in order to finding Saddam Hussein, Americans attacked to underground bunkers and used many large bomb and killed lot of Iraqi civilians.
The consequences of this policy in the United States were systematic killing of unarmed civilians in Afghanistan and Iraq and creation of a global network of both known and secret prisons around the world. Americans attacks to elsewhere in purpose to capturing terrorists, creates a world of dread and peril. Unfortunately, United States remains the superpower in the world and has the world’s most powerful military without practical restraint. Particularly, after 11/sep the president authorized torture to show the world that the United States was a new Rome, it was a symbolic value.
Johnson argues about 20th century empires that rose and fell with parallels to present-day America. He refers to Brits, Soviets, Nazis, Japanese, and Ottomans to show the resemblance between them and America. He focuses on Rome Empire which was approaching the edge of a huge waterfall and about to plunge over it.
It seems that it is logical to compare American republic 230 years after the declaration of independence with ancient Rome and British Empire, because Rome and Britain are the "arch-types" defining where America stand and what America face. The point is that Rome made the wrong choice and perished while Britain chose more wisely and survived.
Rome's military success made it very rich and its leaders arrogant leading to what Johnson calls "the first case of what today we call imperial overstretch." It grew large and unwieldy becoming a state within a state like Pentagon today. It created a culture of militarism that turned into a culture of moral decay leading to the empire's decline and fall. In sum “Rome chose empire, lost its Republic and then everything”.
In fact, collapse of the Roman republic proved that imperialism and militarism can undermine the best defenses of a democracy. The experience of Rome –which was in the position of the present day united states- shows that how empire and militarism erode the foundations of a Republic.
Britain went the other way choosing democracy; enthusiast for the American empire makes the history of British Empire as an acceptable model for the United States. There are some similarities between Great Britain and United States, for example they have never been defeated and occupied by a foreign military power.
American democracy and way of life are now threatened because it now faces - an imperial presidency, erosion of checks and balances and separation of powers, and a culture of militarism, and it's now an uncontrollable state within the state. Now late in the game, America must choose one way or the other. United States can keep itself and lose its democracy because successful imperialism requires that a domestic republic change into a tyranny. It can't have both. As Johnson argues, United States must now choose whether to return to its founding roots or stay on its present path heading to imperial tyranny.

Mother Jones, a person who commented significantly on the American experience

MOTHER JONES, a person who commented significantly on the American experience

Mother Jones, the labor organizer who worked for economic justice and who mobilized laborers and working class families by her dynamic speaking skills and racial organizing method, was called “the most dangerous woman in America” by her opponents. Elizabeth Gurley Flynn, a nationally known labor organizer called Jones “the greatest woman agitator”. “The grandmother of all agitators” was the surname that U.S. senate gave her. She was proud of that title and said she hoped to live to be the great grandmother of aggregators. Her pleasant worlds were full of passion, energy, and hope. Her speeches made miners to think and act, no matter what impossible ideas she brought up, she and the miners could do anything.
The time that Mother Jones lived in, was the time in which everyone had to fight to survive. It was not pacific era. It was the epoch of political and social confusions; she felt the meaning of war and violence. She was born 50 years after American revolution, she lived in Jackson‘s presidency. She knew the civil war, the Spanish-American war, and World War I. she saw the process of industrialization and technological improvement. Telephone, electric light, radio, and … were devices she used in her daily life. She road in automobiles, and she saw the railroads link to the oceans. She saw all of the social impacts of these changes in the life of working class. She watched unions grow from secret groups of hunted men to complacent part of the established order.... Yet, she died on the eve of the New Deal.

Biography:
Mary Harris was the daughter of Roman Catholic tenant farmer on north side of Cork city, Ireland. Her birthday was estimated on August 1, 1837 by recent materials, while she later claimed a birthday of May 1, 1830. Biographer suggested that her claim to an earlier data has been an appeal to add imagine of white-haired “Mother” Jones.
The date of May 1st was chosen symbolically, representing the national labor holiday and anniversary of the Haymarket Riot.
In her birthplace, Jones watched British soldiers marched in streets, the heads of Irishmen stuck on their bayonets. her grandfather, an Irish freedom fighter was hanged and Harrises was forced to move United States in 1840, Mary graduated there from school at seventeen and became a teacher, in 1861 she married Gorge E. Jones, a member of iron molders’ union in Memphis. Probably her knowledge about unions and the psychology of workingmen increased from her husband

Her life was pleasing until the big disaster revolted her life. The first turning point in her life was the time that she lost her husband and four children by yellow fever epidemic within one week. She was forced to return to Chicago and began to work as a dressmaker, she opened a seamstress shop, she sewed cloths for wealthy residents of Chicago, Great Fire changed her life drastically again, she lost her property in the Great Chicago Fire of 1871. Biographers believe that working for wealthy families made the roots of Jones’s interest in labor movement. As Mara Lou Hawse (2004) cited from Fetherling, Mother Jones said: "Often while sewing for the lords and barons who lived in magnificent houses on the Lake Shore Drive, I would look out of the plate glass windows and see the poor, shivering wretches, jobless and hungry, walking alongside the frozen lake front.... The contrast of their condition with that of the tropical comfort of the people for whom I sewed was painful to me. My employers seemed neither to notice nor to care."

Few years after the Great Fire, she stayed in Chicago and worked as a seamstress. She had no fixed home, but Chicago was her base when she traveled back from industrial areas in the country. As she said she lived wherever which was a fight, she lived with the workers, in tent colonies or in shantytowns, near the mills or in the shadow of the tipples. To support herself, she committed to the labor struggle for human wages and working condition. She joined the Knights of Labor which was a predecessor of the Industrial Workers of the World (IWW or "Wobblies) that she helped found in 1905. At the time of founding Industrial Workers of the Word, Jones was the only woman among 27 persons who signed the manifesto of the convention to organize all industrial workers.

During the time she was most active in the labor movement, the economic system changed fundamentally. The agrarian economy replaced with industrial economy. The aftermath of this basic change was noticeable. A new condition of work was created, hunger and poverty was the fate of huge number of immigrants and misplaced farmers whom dug the nation’s coal and forged its steel. Jones was the leader of these hopeless workers to defend from their rights.

As a 30 years old woman who had lost her husband and children and became a union organizer, she began to see labor movement as her family. She reconstructed her life; she renewed herself as “mother” Jones. As a real mother she allocated her life to support the workers in railroad, steel, copper, brewing, textile, and mining industries.
As an efficient organizer in strikes she organized the United Mine Workers (UMW) in West Virginia in 1890s.

Jones bustled against social injustice by government. In 1903 she organized children textile workers in ‘children crusade’ to march from Pennsylvania to New York on President Roosevelt’s home. They demonstrated by “we want time to play” and "We want to go to school! The result of their protest was that the issue of child labor settled in the forefront of the public agenda.

After another children's march she convicted with other union organizers of conspiring to commit murder and was arrested, her arrest resulted in huge tumults by her adherents; that is why she was quickly released from prison. From that time United States Senate began to inspection the situation in mills and mines.

During the Paint Creek-Cabin in 1912-13, there was an obstreperous strike in West Virginian response to continual violence. Mother Jones learned children and wives of miners to protest against the violence. She led a march again through West Virginia. As a result of chaotic condition many people were murdered. Mother Jones was convicted by military court to commit murder and she was denounced to 20 years in prison. Her sentence made lots of furor. However, before more violence, Hatfield, the new governor set mother Jones free. A few months later she was arrested again, when she organized the coal miners in Colorado. After her release from prison, she was invited to Standard Oil's headquarters and found the opportunity to meet John D. Rockefeller, their meeting was a commencement for some reforms that Rockefeller did in Colorado mines.
In 1914, 20 women and children were killed in a miners’ tent colony in Ludlow by the Colorado militia massacred. Jones persuaded President Wilson to reprimand the agents of this calamity. As a defender, it was not pleasant for authorities to tolerate mother Jones. They did anything to condemn her; sometimes she was in court for libel, slander, and sedition.

In 1915 and 1916 she associated with strikers of garment workers and streetcar workers in New York, and then participated in strike of steel workers in Pittsburgh in 1919. It was in 1921, when she traveled to Mexico and attended in pan-American federation of labor meeting. Her attendance was the significant point in her role in the labor movement.
In 1925, two thugs attacked Jones’ house, she fought with them and injured one of them seriously, and he later died from the wounds inflicted on him by Jones. It was a good excuse to arrest Jones, Police immediately arrested her, but she was soon released when the attackers were identified as associates of a prominent local business person.

She was hospitalized several times but she continued to protest and speak when her health permitted. One of her last known public activity was in alliance, Ohio, in 1926 when she participated in Labor Day celebration.

Eventually in her 100th (or 93th) birthday party on May 1930, at a reception in Silver Spring she read congratulatory messages and "made a fiery speech for the motion-picture camera." And it was her last public appearance.

Mother Jones died seven months after her birthday, on November 1930. She is buried in union miners’ cemetery in mount olive, Illinois alongside miners who died in the Virden Riot of 1898. She called these miners, killed in strike-related violence, "her boys".
Many movements were inspired by mother Jones after her dead. In 1989-90, in Virginia and Kentucky the wives and daughters of striking coal miners those inspired by mother Jones legendary named themselves “daughters of mother Jones” In November 2007, the original musical “mother Jones and the march of the mill children”, which was based on the mother Jones’ life.
In overall, despite many disastrous events in her life, Mother Jones’s efforts and her fierce determination was expressed on her famous declaration. Her famous expression was "Pray for the dead and fight like hell for the living." And her ideal was “to live long enough to be the great-grandmother of all agitators."

http://www.fembio.org/biographie.php/frau/biographie/mary-harris-mother-jones/

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mother_jones#Biography

http://www.kentlaw.edu/ilhs/majones.htm

Peoples and empires by Anthony Pagden

Review over Peoples and empires by Anthony Pagden
This book is a "Short History," of western empires which explain about shaping European civilization and includes chronology of key events. It starts with Alexander and ends with the European Union and globalization.
Major stopping points along the way include the Byzantine Empire, the Catholic Church as Empire, the Spanish Empire, British Empire, and the European Colonial systems into the 20th Century.
The story of the empires of the peoples of the Europe begins in the ancient Greece.
The term ancient Greece refers to the periods of classical antiquity to Roman conquest which provided foundation of western civilization, and later influenced 18th and 19th century Europe and the America.

The book begins with Alexander, an ancient Greece king.
Alexander life became a tale of the elision of knowledge and understanding with power.
In the middle ages, Alexander became a legendary figure whose desire to subjugate the entire world and eventually he conquered the Persian Empire, including Anatolia, Syria, Phoenicia, Judea, Gaza, Egypt, Bactrian and Mesopotamia and extended the boundaries of his own empire as far as the borders of Punjab.
In the end, Alexander could not manage both Europe and Asia. As a result, at first Romans and then Christians Latin kingdoms of Europe replaced the Greeks.
By the late sixth century Rome had a republican form of government through a series of civil wars and precise event roman republic had transited to Roman Empire. What today is thought of as the Roman Empire had been acquired under the republic, republics have been able to create empires, they have all, fallen prey to the ambitions of the strongest among them. This is what became of the Greek city-states, and it is what finally became of roman when the empire had grown too big.
And by the first century B.C., most of what had survived of the empire of Alexander had fallen into Roman hands.
Most Romans recognized the Rome the United States and the Soviet Union in the 1950s-60s.
In the middle years of the century the roman legions had suffered terrible defeats at the hands of Persians and the Goths and other Germanic tribes and civil wars. In the last attempt to keep the empire, the empire had divided into a western and an eastern half by Diocletian- the last emperor of undivided empire. The end of Roman Empire is sometimes when Western Roman Empire was deposed and not replaced
After declaration of Rome Empire there would be two suns shining upon the glob. Two rulers competing for universal supremacy, a Christian emperor in the west and a Muslim sultan in the east.
The European and Asian empires had all been linked to large, well-trained, and highly mobile land forces.
Charles v created a roman and holy empire in the center but, for many years the glob had continued a single landmass divided into three linked continents, Europe, Asia, and Africa.
In the fifteenth century, however, this vision of the world began to change. After discovery of America and mastery of Atlantic and pacific, Europe became the strongest power in the world.
Charles v established the roman and holy empire in the central European state. Christendom was the most noticeable feature if this roman holy empire.
Christian church was based on layer upon of highly sophisticated interpretations of its founders' words, filtered through Greek philosophy and roman jurisprudence.
A Spanish Dominican priest -Las Casas- for the first time established bishop of Chiapas[1]. As a settler in the new world he was galvanized by witnessing the toture and genocide of the Native Americans by the Spanish colonists. He became a symbol of the fight against the injustices of colonialism," the friend of humanity".
Albeit he never doubted the superiority of European civilization, never doubted that without Christ the inhabitants of Americas doomed to eternal damnation and he never doubted that was only whit the coming of Columbus that peoples that had lain in oblivion during centuries, had entered history.
Casas's reading of history legitimated the Spanish occupation of the America in the name of church and ultimately made the Europeans the paternal instructors of all those who later come to be called the "backward" race of the world.
Las Casas's protested against the cruelty of the Spanish settlers had been made not only when Spain was the most powerful sate in the Europe , but when its ruler, Charles v, could claim to be the heir to Augustus , the bringer of order and peace to the entire world. But, the decline of Spain had begun by the mid-sixteenth century when a long war ensued and gradually drew in most of the states of Europe, squandered massive resources and millions of lives, and spread across half of the world. The war and its consequences caused Spain lost all its remaining Europe possessions, and the empire was reduced, in effect, to the Americans and the Philippines. By the beginning of the nineteenth century, the Spanish colonists began to resent the autocratic presence of a remote and declining European power. Finally, in 1898, the United States occupied and liberated the Philippines and drove the Spanish out of Cuba and Puerto Rico.

Slavery:
Slaves came from all over Greek and Raman worlds, in the Roman Empire and medieval Europe slaves act as domestic servants, but modern slavery changed its ancient and medieval predecessors which began when Africans were taken from Senegal, the European demand for slaves effectively transformed what had been a local commercial practice into the greatest forced migration in human history, modern slavery was a massive transatlantic trade. Africans went to America; they had sought completely different from Europeans. By the time first the British, then the French and Spanish found that somewhere in the world existed where provided all mankind required.
After independence revolution of the united state and British loose its colonists and empire, the fight against slavery began.
Also, slavery impact on the modern relationship between the developed and the developing worlds.
By the middle age of the 18th century every territory in the earth had been charted or colonized by Europeans.
Eventually protests against slavery and colonization began and increased.

American foreign policy

In the last decade of 20th century Great Britain was at the center of the global empire and financial system. The Britain which entered into 20th century as a lion became a weak lamb. During the revolution British troops occupied many major cities in American colonies; the United States had no power to resist against the European powers. But American people did not allow the government to look weak in foreign policies.
After revolution continental congress was not able to manage foreign relations under the article of confederation, and supporters of new constitution notice to power of the national government to have effective foreign policy.
In the last years of 19th century and early in the 20th century American politics changed by series of foreign policy debates. No European power did better than United States in the 20th century, all of them played much worse. Americans be aware of relationships between domestic prosperity and international economy. Even in the 19th century foreign policy was at the hearth of American politic. There were four important issues in American politics during he 19th century; slavery, westward expansion, the tariffs and monetary policy. All of these are recognized as foreign policy even the issue of slavery.
American government in 19th century played important role to opening the doors of American and African trades. The United States played admirable role in the international relations.
Politics elites notice to American foreign policy during the isolationist period, even. During American isolation us navy was active in every ocean.
After civil wars America became world power while established hegemony in the western hemisphere. United States had undeniable role in shaping the peace, the monarchical power of Europe vanished after war while it was great thrones previously.
World War I made the United States the world's greatest financial power defeated Germany economically and weakened Britain and France. The result of the war indicated that any country in the world could overcome the great power of United States.
The result of the world war II was the same, the united states enter the war later than other powers , lost less blood and realized greater gains.
The American language, culture, products diffused in the world, its dollar became international means of business and its popular culture dominated the media and market around the world. Foreign investment played noticeable role in American prosperity.
The United States became central power in a worldwide system of finance, communications, and trade.
The criticism of American policy are so various and vociferous.
When we examine the content of criticism against American foreign policy we find a series of contradictory themes: that American foreign policy is naive, too calculating, too openhanded, too violent, too isolationist, too universality, too unilateral, too multilateral, too moralistic, and too immoral.
At the time of the American Revolution, there was some thing like an intellectuals run the government which brought active and successful foreign policy, it was aristocracy. Aristocrats had the leisure to travel abroad and to study the history and languages required for diplomacy. They took long view of their country's interests, they were prepared to undertake policies whose benefits might not mature for many years but it changed gradually;
Here we focus on Continental realism as an approach to foreign policy;
Realism believes that countries are controlled by interests and quest for power in international relations rather than ideals and humanity and charity. Continental realists believe in "auteur" theory of foreign policy. Continental realists believe that the best foreign policy is the product of a single great master: a Bismarck, a Talleyrand, a Metternich, or a Kissinger. But, American political system did not created a smooth path for such characters and American foreign policy is not the product of a single mastermind. The senate provides its votes from all of the fifty states. The procedure of the senate ensures that regional views of the national interest will be represented in the process. Clearly the full regional diversity of the United States will be reflected in the conduct of its foreign policy. Voting patterns founded on these regional realities have often shaped American foreign policy in the past. The United States have always included many regions with different views and priorities in foreign policy. It has idealistic and populist voices in its foreign policy
Also continental realism refers to democratic nature of American policy.
Foreign policy was shaped by democratic values, interests, through both the 19th and 20th century. From the opinion of observes it is not a good thing both in foreign and domestic policy. Few people believe in the ability of democracies to conduct their foreign affairs in the moderate, firm, constructive and farsighted fashion.
Democratic theory believes that people can give wise judgments about domestic politics because each person is most capable of determining which candidates or measure best serves his or her interest but it is much less clear that citizens are informed about the vital issues in foreign policy.
In any case American foreign policy remained on a balance of constracting and competing voices and values, while, from 1949 to 1989 the United States was consumed by controversy over foreign policy, the time that the fundamental elements of foreign policy came into question.
Now the policy of United States is containment, it built NATO, it built a system of international trade it administrates the international system whit no serious war.
In fact, the position of the United States in world politics has changed from generation to generation and even decade to decade, interestingly, United States had no foreign policy before isolation and it was not prepared to face the world into which it emerged in twentieth century.
In the wartime, the fascism and Japanese ideologies which had been the cause of war, crushed and world’s free people including Russians, Chinese, the British and the French were in control and American foreign policy which apparently was fade, led to myth of cold war.
Some basic elements led to rise of continental realism in the United States during cold war. At first, United States did not face serious economic competition during the cold war because of its financial independence. Also, the federal government became larger, more powerful and more secretive and gradually imperial presidency was created. Social and cultural factors also pushed the United States toward continental realism.

o In the twenty-first century, American foreign policy focused on other issues which were less important during cold war. These issues were economics, international order building or globalization, and the relationship of democracy and foreign policy.
New paradigm for American foreign policy depends on three basic ideas. The first is that American economy has been in the core of international economic system. The second idea is that American foreign policy has been determined by nation interest in international trading and financial order. The third one is the importance of democracy in American success. On the other hand there is a link between American foreign policy and domestic policy. Both of them try to prepare free, prosperous and peaceful world for Americans.

Schools of American foreign policy:
There are four approaches in American foreign policy which have evolved in response to changes in the international order and in American society. The first school is “Hamiltonians” which believes that providing American interest is the most important duty of government.
“Wilsonian” is the second school. It believes that United States has both moral and practical duty to spread its values through the world. It emphasizes on legal and moral aspects of world order than on economic agenda.
The third one believes that American democracy is in danger and American independence should be defended. The sources of this approach are john Quincy Adams and George Kennan. The final school is named for Andrew Jackson. He represents a populist and popular culture of honor, independence, courage, and military pride among the American people.
Mostly, in American foreign policy Hamiltonians and Wilsonian were conquering approaches.


Walter Ruseell mead, (2000), Special providence American foreign policy and how it changed the world.

“Social stratification in United States”

Social stratification:
When we speak of social stratification we mean inequality between various groups of people. Inequality exists in all sorts of societies and cultures. Societies are consisted of layers that are hierarchical.
The four basic stratification systems are: 1) slavery 2) caste 3) estate 4) class.
Stratification systems of slavery, caste and estate have been demolished in modern societies except some tribal societies.
The social class system is mainly a description of how scarce resources (wealth, income, education and occupation) are distributed in society. In other words Class could be explained as an indication of the positions a person may occupy within society, positions which are not equal.Thus, in order to analysis social classes in a society, it is necessary to explain that how these resources are distributed and make social classes.
In spite of the fact that some scholars argue that in developed countries, inequality has reduced rather than previous societies but, social stratification, inequality and class conflict have increasing rate today. In the United States Inequality between rich and poor has increased to the extent that the gap among them is larger than any point in the past 75 years. United States has the largest wealth disparity of any industrialized nation in the world and this disparity is growing larger every year.

In the United States, income is obviously one important scarce resource. Clearly, it is occupation that provides income, and it is education that determines the sort of occupation. At the more extent level, income is related to life consequences, such as the quality and quantity of education, health care, and housing one obtains, and even the how long one lives. So, there is interrelationship between accesses to each of these sources.
As I mentioned, in the United States individual income depends on educational characteristics; in 2005 most people with doctorate and professional degrees were in top 15% of income earners. Those with Bachelor degrees had incomes considerably above the national median and people with college degree had less income.
Also the below chart indicates the link between education and income;

Chart 1-Median personal income by educational attainment (2005)

degree High school H s graduate college Associate degree Bachelor degree Master's degree Professionaldegree earning $20,321 $26,505 $31,054 $35,009 $49,303 $52,390 $82,473


The noticeable point is that, while the population of the United States is becoming increasingly educated on all levels, the conspicuous link between income and educational attainment remains.
Another point is that tertiary education is rarely free; education in elite private colleges for a four year program costs $120,000 approximately. While public colleges and universities costs much less but they are not free. Scholarships and low interest loans by government and universities are available too, but still the cost of education is high for many people.
Overall, educational attainment serves as one of the most essential class feature of most Americans, which is directly linked to income and occupation.

On one hand occupational status is consequence of educational attainment, personal or family income and on the other hand it defines access to other resources including income and health.
Low-wage jobs are associated with those people who have less education. Workers in these areas are unskilled because it does not require education in order to perform these jobs. But, White collar jobs require more human capital, skill and knowledge and therefore produce higher earnings. With higher education it is more likely for one to occupy a professional-level job wherein he or she may earn a higher salary. Therefore, those with less education are more likely to be working in Low-wage jobs.
Each particular job influences on lifestyle; income and prestige that gained from a job determine living environment, the kind of foods, medical care, sort of social networks, entertainment, spare times, and behavior.
It is education that makes upper-middle, middle and lower-middle scores on occupational spectrum; unskilled employees, employees with less than seven years of schooling, high school graduated ones, college graduate, licentiate, MS holders, professionals and experts with Doctorate degree located on different scores of occupational spectrum. So while all functions and positions in society do not determine with occupation, the job role is one of the most important status features in the United States.
Another feature that determines individuals’ position in the society is wealth. Wealth is what people own in assets such as houses, cars, stocks, shares, saved money, and lands.
While United States is the second rich county in the world, the distribution of wealth is too unfair. The top 1% of all population owned 38% of the wealth, 10% of population had 71% of wealth and on the other hand the bottom 40% owned less than 1% of the nation's wealth.
Totally, the distribution of wealth is much more unequal than the distribution of income (what people receive in the course of a year by working).

According to these basic elements (income, wealth, occupation and education) which determine the social class of individuals and households, Americans believe in three- class model that includes the rich, the middle class and the poor, while, in reality American society is more diverse, economically and sociologically. It means that there is no clear class distinction between socio-economic strata.

Social mobility:
The most important concept in a class system of stratification is social mobility. In class system, social stratification based on both birth and individual achievement; personal merit becomes more important. In fact, Industrial societies move towards meritocracy and in this kind of societies status consistency is lower than in other sorts of societies. Since societies became more competitive and more meritocratic some elements such as energy, social skills, character, ambition, physical attractiveness, talent, and luck played great role in social mobility and changing social position.
Now the question is that “How much mobility Americans have experienced during their life?”
Social mobility refers to changes in social position which occur during a person’s lifetime. There are two ways to study social mobility; Intragenerational Mobility and Intergenerational mobility.
By the first concept, we mean upward and downward movement in social ladder and by second one we refer to upward and downward movement in social hierarchy compared with the previous generation.
In order to explaining occupational mobility, mostly, scholars focus on father-child or household head–child occupational persistence (Intergenerational mobility).
If we distinguished six general occupational categories including upper professional or manager, lower professional or clerical, self-employed, technical or skilled trade, farm, unskilled and service workers, in united states, among men whom born after 1950, 32 percent of men were immobile (their occupation was in the same category as their father's), 37 percent were upwardly mobile, and 32 percent were downwardly mobile. About women, data show that 27 percent were immobile, 46 percent were upwardly mobile, and 28 percent were downwardly mobile. Then, in occupation upward mobility was more common than downward mobility and Comparisons with other industrialized countries occupational mobility in the United States is reasonably high.
According to studies, intergenerational elasticity (IGE) in income between fathers and sons was estimated 0.4 or higher. Totally, actual association between parents' and children's incomes is high.
Wealth mobility is totally different from occupational and income mobility; at first, wealth is important because its distribution is more unequal than the distribution of income and on the other hand it effects on other aspects of family well-being, especially homeownership and investment in children's education. Also, there is substantial intergenerational persistence in family wealth and the correlation is in the neighborhood of 0.50. The disparity in wealth persists between the generations. Thus, people who have no wealth loose opportunities. As an example, inherited wealth can put families in better neighborhoods and school districts than they could afford if they had to rely just on their incomes.

Social class in the United States is affected by individual achievement, as I said, Occupation, educational attainment and income can be earned and increased through a lifetime, but still it is undeniable that the rich have more money, more education, better occupation, better health, and consume more.
As a conclusion we should say that without the concept of social stratification, it is impossible to understand people’s behavior, because social class determines all aspects of our life…., our happiness, our religious beliefs, our customs, our interests and hobbies our health and even how long we will live and totally our life style.

http://www.urban.org/
http://www.futureofchildren.org/
http://www.wikipedia.com/

What is American studies?

American studies is an interdisciplinary study composed of the many disciplines, all of which try to describe the culture of United States. The multi-disciplinary perspectives on culture of United States accompanies the other major aspects of American society such as its politics, economy, history and also more specific fields on these matters like arts, government, literature, communications, education, religion and etc…. American studies provides a program in which music, literature, media, etc…. are studied in cultural and historical background. On the other hand foreign and public policy, foreign and public culture, educational system and …. are studied from the point of economy, politics, culture and history.
On the other hand, each of ethnic groups and minorities such as women, African Americans, Jews, Moslems and homosexuals are noticeable parts of American studies from the point of economy, politics, culture and history.
Some thing that is conspicuous in all of these fields is Americanism. It means that in all of this studies exceptional characteristic of American culture makes it totally different from situation of all other countries in the world. American studies is study of power and diversity. American studies is the analyses of the super power which is controlling the whole world. It is study of the multi cultural society which includes various cultures and subcultures and at the same time has created a unique and distinctive culture.
United States is running the economical system of the world; it owns all political power and controls the world according to its own policies. despite the fact that the history of the united states is not too long but it is the history of war and force, it is the history of creation of super power in an approximately short time.
in order to understanding the world, recognition of united states as super power is necessary.

Female prisoners' rights
United States has criticized for having huge number of prisoners and increasing number of female prisoners; in 2004 United States had highest percentage of prisoners in the world. There were more than 2.2 million in prisons or jails, or 737 per 100,000 population, or roughly 1 out of every 136 Americans.
Human Rights Watch complains about this huge population of prisoners, it believes that this rate of incarceration damages individuals, families, communities and strength of the nation. In any case the issue that I am going to focus here is not the high rate of prisoners but, it is their rights and their condition in prison. Federal and state laws established rights of prisoners as well as other humans. Although they do not have full constitutional rights but, the constitution protects them from cruel and unusual punishment. They are protected against unequal treatment on the basis of race, sex, and creed. In fact, prisoners' right is one of noticeable part of human rights which is expected to be provided based upon the constitution of United States as the first defender of human rights. But, the government of United States does not concentrate to execution of human rights in prison. According to senior counsel of the US Program at Human Rights Watch in condition that approximately one in 20 prisoners being raped or sexually abused, it is clear that prison authorities do not take enough action to prisoners' rights.
Certainly prison rape is not inevitable but, Human Rights Watch concerns on prisoners' rape in United States because the rate of reported Sexual abuse and rape in United States prisons are unusual and extraordinary.
There are 148,000 women in state and federal prisons. Female inmates are victim of rape, sexual extortion by prison officials. Correctional officials retaliate against women who complain about sexual assault and harassment, and they threat women’s children and visitation rights as a means of silencing the women. Sometimes segregation or long staying in jail is the punishment of those who speak anything about sexual abuse.
Also, sexual abuse has occurred by inmates. In this cases officials do not attention to provide prisoners security, they do not answer to complaints of unwanted sexual activity. Mostly, they condoned inmate-on-inmate abuse. Totally, being a female prisoner in united stares is an awful experience. Women are sexually abused, they are suffered by officials or other inmates, complaints are not effective, officials are not accountable for their crime because they have more power than prisoners. Some times guilty officials are just sent to other places to work, not have been punished. All these show that the authorities fail to manage effective policy on sexual abuse.
Noticeably, one of the most important elements in sexual misconduct in United States prisons for women is that the government permits male to be employees and guards in women prisons. In this position, prisoners who are condemned for breaking others' rights, loose their primary rights, they loose their physical security. Sexual abuse threats women lives it devastates human spirit. It leads to depression, and shattering loss of self-esteem.
Under both international and national law prisons are required to prohibit torture and other cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment or punishment and to ensure that such abuse is investigated and punished.

http://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/index.php/Prisoners
http://www.spr.org/index.asp
http://www.hrw.org/

http://www.wikipedia.org/