Sunday, December 23, 2007

book review over Black Civil Rights in America



Title: Black Civil Rights in America
Author: Kevern Verney
Publisher: Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2006


This book is a commanding introduction to the history of black civil rights in the U.S., it provides a comprehensive history of African American struggle for freedom from 1860-1990.
The first five chapters encircle what might be seen as the traditional areas of African American studies and the last two chapters add future perception of African Americans.
In chapter one, Kevern Verney, begins with explaining about growth of urban population in American society in the last decades of 19th century by internal migration and mostly overseas immigration.
Between 1880 and 1921 most of the immigrants arrived from southern and eastern European countries, but in the world war period because of wartime condition and also legal restrictions, European immigration fell and industrial growth led to great migration (1915-1925) in which 7 million African Americans escaped from racism in rural southern United States into cities. In fact they were offended from southern cities for some reasons such as suffering economic condition, and on the other hand boom in industrial productions created job opportunities for blacks in north. Their situation in north was better, though, racism was present there.
At first, most large cities of north had small African American communities but gradually racial tensions increased and segregation spread in cities, formally.
After a while whites and blacks found that in race relations they could not achieve any improvement.
By creation of this idea about racism, national urban league (NUL) was established as the major civil rights organization in 20th century.
Also, Marcus Garvey founded universal negro improvement association and African communities league and in 1923 it had one million members in the united states.

Chapter two allocated to Great Depression (1928) and consequences of Second World War (1939-45) for African Americans.Verney explains Great Depression as a dramatic, world wide economic downturn which led to urban poverty and unemployment and racial discrimination.
On one hand, administration of republican president Herbert Hoover did noting to reduce blacks disasters during great depression and on the other hand the aims of national black civil rights organization were influenced by the Great Depression.
One of the most important African Americans leaders was emerged in 1920 that named Philip Randolph. He found Brotherhood of Sleeping Car Porters (BSCP) which was the first black labor union .later; in 1935 he became the president of the National Negro Congress. NNC was established in order to unite black groups to confront the problems of the depression. But it was not able to deal with the problems.
By the liberalists’ victory in the presidential election, New Deal was innovated in order to giving reform to people and economy of the United States during great depression. In 1935 National Youth Administration as a new deal agency established under the supervision of an African American.
But, in practice, not all new Deal agencies were enlighted, but New Deal as a whole was beneficially to African Americans.
In 1935 a trade union body for workers was formed which raised the political consciousness of black workers. All of these changes constituted pre-condition for civil rights campaigns.
The Second World War, also, had noticeable results for African Americans but the total impact of that was to advance further the changes set in motion during New Deal. In wartime huge number of blacks served in U.S. army and as a result their grassroots consciousness increased and after war they had heightened expectations and but unfortunately during 1930 and 1940 there were few racial advances in popular culture.

In chapter three he describes the effects of the Second World War on civil rights movements as a vital part of the blacks' struggles for freedom and then vernery refers to the process of African American civil rights .
In the mid 1940 the national democratic party was divided on racial issue , while, northern wing argued for a more liberal stance on civil rights questions the southern opposed to any changes in the status quo.
Truman empowered the creation of a rights committee to investigate the state of race relations in America by that he made the first third party presidential election. In any case, committee recommendations awarded for an end to segregation in transportation, in public schools and later in military.
The emergence of civil rights in the end of the Second World War was destroyed by cold war politics.
But later, newcomers from the Third World encouraged African Americans for civil rights and on the other hand anti- communist purges help civil rights groups to authorize themselves. Civil rights groups during the 1950s and 1960s focused on issues like voting rights but because of disorders civil rights campaigns failed to confront problems of poverty and economic inequality.
Ultimately all of these changes led to some advances for blacks but racial relationship dominated in the society.
In this chapter the author focused also on great men as Martin Luther, Elijah, Muhammed, Malcolm, Jesse Jackson, but except for a brief mention pf Ella Baker the importance of the women to the movement is virtually ignored.

Chapter 4 of this book is about Black Power during the 1965 and 1976. It noticed to Black Power adherents whom believed in Black Nationalism and necessity to use violence as a means of achieving their aims.
As the result a black power group organized revolutionary action movement and then Black Panther Party as an African American organization.
But the severest repression destroyed the Black Panthers and most of its leaders were killed or imprisoned .when Nixon became president he concentrated on the principle that the law must be color-blind and he support affirmative action, that’s why during his time integration of public schools in the South foe the first time took place.

Chapter 5 begins with black condition during 1980s. In the first years if the 1980s blacks achieved political success but Jesse Jackson whom was a candidate of democratic presidential nomination held no elect office at all. But he could establish Rainbow and PUSH which were established to demand social programs, voting rights and affirmative actions. Totally race relations were reflected in American popular culture during the last 25 years of 20th century.

As a conclusion it should be say although African Americans achieved some success but many figures of the civil rights movement has ignored; in the last year of 20th century half of the black children continued to live in poverty, many black men were in prison and... .

Verney is able to highlight key turning points and developments, their causes and consequences.
This book is invaluable for both students and readers whom want to have an almanac for African Americans history.

Life in the white house

The White House presents Life in the White House, an exclusive presentation of the rich history of the White House and West Wing


The Oval Office is the formal office of the president of the united states which is located in the west wing of the white house,where he confers with heads of state, diplomats, his staff, and other politicians and where he deals with the
issues of the day

Each president decorated it according to his taste and certainly the decoration of that indicates interests and believes and memories of him.
Just marble mantel from the original 1909 Oval Office, the presidential seal in the ceiling (which is the official arms of the U.S. presidency and is based on the great seal of united states) , and the two flags behind the president's
desk remined the same for all presidents.

Gorge Bush explains about his office in a personal interview; in this interview he speaks about the decoration of his workplace.When he talks about his office he .expresses his satisfaction of working in the nice and calm office.
He speaks about the large south-facing window behind the his desk, the carpet which indicates peace not war, the Resolute desk as old famous desk which was a gift from Queen Victoria to president Resolute B. Hayes in 1879 The desk was made famous by a photograph of President John F. Kennedy.

Then he speaks about the pictures in his office. Art may be selected from the White House collection, or may be borrowed for the length of an administration. Interestingly, he has selected several paintings depicting Texas scenes by Texas artists for his office. Many are on loan from museums in San Antonio and El Paso. He believes that all of the pictures in his office carry the meaning of peace, union, responsibility of the president. He believes that the view of one of his tableau says him that a president should shines he should shines for all members of his country.
Also three sculptures he selected are statue of the 3 presidents, he explains about Lincoln more, the named him as his favorite president whom conserved union of united states and made continuance of the America.

The Oval Office became a symbol of strength and reassurance the evening of September 11, 2001, when President George W. Bush delivered comforting words through a televised address from the Oval Office
http://www.whitehouse.gov/history/life/video/index.html

Six students shot in Las Vegas after getting off school bus

"Six students shot in Las Vegas after getting off school bus"

Las Vegas Strip- Six teenagers were wounded by gunfire Tuesday in a shooting at a school bus stop in Las Vegas,
Nevada, local police said. (news.yahoo.com)




Hours before the shooting the fight happened in the Mojave High School and school police arrested three teenagers, they were about 16 years old. The police said two weapons, a 9-millimeter and a 45-caliber were used.

The six students whom injured were transformed to University Medical Center; as hospital spokeswoman said one of the-- an 18-year- old boy—was in critical condition and a 17- year-old boy was in worse condition. Four other students had minor gunshot injuries to their arms and legs.
There are 2300 blacks, whites and Hispanics students in Mojave High School as one of the larger high school in the region.

“The bus stop shooting was not a random act; police said.”

But, in fact, it was another shooting tragedy which was created by teenagers in united state.
These sorts of disasters in schools and universities of United States proved that security is not protected for ordinary people, even in the schools. It seems gun politics is not accurate and efficient. Ownership and usage of firearms do not control in a way that protect public security.

Increasing number of shooting in public places indicates increasing trend of violence and coarseness among people and also shows that many people suffer from mentally illness, both whom are doer of these crimes and whom are victims.




http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/12/us/12vegas.html?_r=1

&ref=us&oref=sloginhttp://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22207840

rebellion against victorianism


Rebellion Against Victorianism: The Impetus for Cultural Change in 1920s America.

Author: Stanley Coben

Publisher: New York and Oxford, Oxford University Press,
1991. 242 pp.

Reviewed by: Nasrin Dastjerdi and Sara Sajadi


The 1920s in America was a decade of rebellion, reform, and reaction as traditional Victorian values came under attack from all sides. When various groups of intellectuals, blacks, feminists, and dissatisfied economic and political groups assaulted on Victorianism.
Through a descriptive writing style, Stanley Coben goes through the reasons for the tremendous cultural changes during the 1920s and explains them historically. He begins with the concept of Victorian "character," which is a familiar concept for Americans of the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. A character that, as Coben himself defines, was dependably self-controlled, punctual, orderly, hardworking, conscientious, sober, respectful of other Victorians’ property rights, ready to postpone immediate gratifications for long-term goals, pious toward a usually friendly God, a believer in the truth of the Bible, oriented strongly toward home and family, honorable in relations with other Victorians, anxious for self-improvement in a fashion which might appear compulsive to modern observers, and patriotic.
In the following chapters, he illustrates how intelligentsia developed, how intellectuals’ values were changed over time and how it led them inevitably into conflict and then he describes vividly the events that supported the growth of this intellectual subculture. Making it easier to understand he puts the events in a frame of four particularly consequential ones.
The book pays a special attention to cultural matters, showing how art forms of the '20s-like jazz or the novels of Ernest Hemingway and Sinclair Lewis-were part of the rebellion. It devotes one whole chapter to describe how the steady flow of black migrants north caused demographic changes and suggested opportunities to them to improve their status and enforce their activities. And then Jazz as one of the most destructive activities of blacks was there to stay as Leopold Stokowski, conductor of the Philadelphia Orchestra, asserted in 1924:
“Jazz has come to stay …and it is useless to fight against it. Already its vigor, its new vitality, is beginning to manifest itself.
The Negro musicians of America are playing a great part in this change. …They are not hampered by traditions or conventions, with their new ideas, their constant experiments, they are causing new blood to flow in the veins of music. In America, I think, lies perhaps the greatest hope in the whole musical world.”
Going through feminist movements and the changes in economic and political order of the country that set the scene for the rebellion, at the end there is a fascinating chapter about the Ku Klux Klan which reveals the Klan as the most visible and powerful guardian of Victorianism during the 1920s.
What makes the whole more thoughtful is the new perspective that Coben brings to show how the contradictions that were the trigger for the rebellion in 1920s still exist, the ones that brought together workers, farmers, socialists, ethnic groups, intellectuals, black leaders, and many feminists.
Coben’s study is of great value particularly for its perfect historical analysis. In fact it has got a refreshing change from most boring history texts. Illustrating the relationship between culture and politics through describing the process of a phenomenon happened in the history of a country like America, he gives the reader a real example that can be contemplated and compared with similar issues. The process through which Coben leads the reader to come to some conclusions and think about present-day issues is designed skillfully and at the same time the way he addresses the existing problems forcefully is appreciable. However it could be better if the idea suggested at the end was developed more to give more evidences to the readers and let them make better judgments. Nevertheless, Rebellion Against Victorianism certainly receives careful attention from scholars and students interested in the intersections between culture and politics, as well as the wider concern about the similar contemporary problems. It can also be a good supplementary text for use in undergraduate courses on 20th-century American history or in American studies courses focusing on twentieth-century cultural development. It will be unfortunate if doesn’t trigger or contribute to a discussion about the effective role of cultural changes in politics and examining the same issues in the present society.

"More people banned from buying guns after tragedy at Virginia Tech"


Mukasey in comments prepared for delivery to the National Association of Attorneys General said;" Instant background checks are essential to keeping guns out of the wrong hands"
Justice Department said Thursday mentioned mental health problems has more than doubled after massacre at Virginia tech, when a gunman shot a men and woman in university campus before making his way to a classroom building, silently and coolly then, he killed 30 more people and injured 15 others.
Mukasey believed while privacy of citizens should be protect by government, background checks are necessary because of people's mental health.
People with criminal histories include illegal immigrants and domestic violence offenders whom are barred from buying guns.
As National Rifle Association spokesman Andrew Arulanandam said the gun-rights group has no problem with the database.
Mukasey emphasized that instant background check system can be effective with accurate and complete enforcement. He said," Currently, 28 states submit names to the mental health database, and the federal government cannot force the other 22 to follow suit."

It seems it is essential to restrict people liberty to keep them secure and safe. Then is it true to individual rights is more important than social control as individual rights advocates believe?

Supreme Court to rule on right to keep handguns at home


Supreme Court to rule on right to keep handguns at home

The
Supreme Court announced that it would decide whether the Constitution grants individuals the right to keep guns in their homes for private use, plunging the justices headlong into a divisive and long-running debate over how to interpret the Second Amendment’s guarantee of the “right of the people to keep and bear arms.

This is clearly going to be one of the biggest ... cases decided this year," said Georgetown University law professor Randy Barnett. "It is one of the very few times when the Supreme Court has the opportunity to interpret a provision of the Constitution ... unencumbered by previous Supreme Court rulings.
Washington banned handguns in 1976, saying it was designed to reduce violent crime in the nation's capital. The Second Amendment of united state constitution reads: "A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed."
Clearly, it is one of the most important decisions by court, on the other hand this decision shall change the relations between peoples and government as a security organization.

There are two different views exist about Firearms rights as one of the most controversial and intractable issues in American politics:

The first view may be found among proponents of gun rights. The idea considers "individual rights advocates” which argue that individual rights are more important than social control. It tends to increase
civil rights. This is traditionally associated with liberalism. From this point of view Freedom means people should have fewer laws restricting whatever they want to do. Then people should have their own guns to defend their homes, because they feel they need them, people should be free to own an effective weapon to defend their homes against dangers. According to this opinion, this decision limits government and increases personal rights.
As an instant I can refer to Dick Anthony Heller, an armed security guard, who said: "I want to be able to defend myself and my wife from violent criminals, and the Constitution says I have a right to do that by keeping a gun in my home. The police can't be everywhere, and they can't protect everyone all the time".

On the other hand, individual rights can be described as rights which government should protect for citizens and it is the duty of the government to prepare security for people and made them safe against crimes. They believe the second amendment of the Constitution of the United States which was written to protect the individual’s right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Adrian M. Fenty, Washington Mayor, who is one of the followers, says “I hoped the high court would uphold the city's ordinance. The council enacted the handgun ban more than 30 years ago because it would reduce handgun violence. It has saved many lives since then and will continue to do so if allowed to remain in force."

While there is no doubt on this statement which said "individual rights are commonly assumed to be inversely related to social control" but the subject is still open to argue that how protection of individual rights actually makes social control by the government more effective
http://news.google.com/?ned=us&topic=n. (2007/nov/21)

http://news.yahoo.com/i/718;_ylt=At_fj0.P.IAa4Z24UDM7DvKs0NUE (2007/nov/21)

A symbol of peace?

A symbol of peace?
Iranian and American beach soccer captains have exchanged gifts as a symbol of peace before their encounter at Beach Soccer World Cup.

"We'd seen news stories on the game that mentioned the political situation and that gave me the idea of buying white flowers as a symbol of peace…The exchange of gifts was a show of interest in peace for the entire world…The Iranian captain was moved by the gesture and they returned the compliment by giving us a memento."
The American beach soccer captains,Francis Farberoff,said after Sunday match with Iran, at the FIFA Beach sccer World Cup in Brazil.

On the other hand, Iran national beach soccer team captain, Abbas Hashem-pour said, "The exchange of gifts showed that it is possible for our two nations to remain at peace with each other. In sport, peace is stronger than any divisions."

This alliance as a symbol of peace could be analyzed from the idealists' point of view. This approach emphasizes that peace is an achievable phenomena and violence could be deleted among humans' and nations' relationships
Also, cultural peace theory as an idealistic theory believes that humans are able to be in the permanent peace, because tension has built by humans' thoughts, thus, tentionmakers- humans- are able to solve all violences calmy.
Then, it is possible that humans become close to peace, to real peace. In contrast, realists believe that governments are violent reals which are greedy to increase their own profit

Now, according to these notes I can analyze the news sport match of "Iranian and American beach soccer captains have exchanged gifts". Such an uncommon event had occurred in 1988 during Soccer World Cup as well. Evidently, it was a non-political occurrence showing different believes between nations and goverments. Nations could be in peace and may have nice relationships socially and culturally, while their states are in unfriendly relations at the same time.
Presumably, it is not incorrect if is said that nations's approach is idealistic; where as, state's viewpoint is realistic. Such an idea implies that , regardless of the political situation, their nations could be in peace as exchanged- gift event indicates that people are eager to be in amicable relations like the relation which exists between two sides scientists.

American vursus Iranian audiences:
The news has extensively and broadly published in American media as well. The feedback from the news shows that Americans found it as a noticeable matter which is a move in order to establish better relations regardless of political terms. However, it is not easy to judge Iranian's view in such circumstances. One reason is the fact that such events are not covered and exhibited via mass media broadly. Moreover, public is not interested in following such news and reports.

As a conclusion, the symbolic action of" Iranian and American beach soccer captains" indicates different attitude between Iranian and American political and apolitical terms.
Of course, these kinds of friendly relations which existis in apolitical terms should be reflected via mass media as symbols of worldly peace.

http://www.fifa.com/beachsoccerworldcup/news/index.html (2007/nov/5)

http://www.farsnews.com/newsv.php?srv=4&title=1 (2007/nov/5)

http://www.irandiplomacy.ir/modules/news/article.php?storyid=244 (2007/nov/6)

http://www.presstv.ir/defalt.aspx (2007/nov/5)